A:
Positive:
1 x 16711455 x 3342297 x 23873519 x 8795535 x 4774749 x 3410595 x 17591133 x 12565245 x 6821359 x 4655665 x 2513931 x 1795
Negative:
-1 x -1671145-5 x -334229-7 x -238735-19 x -87955-35 x -47747-49 x -34105-95 x -17591-133 x -12565-245 x -6821-359 x -4655-665 x -2513-931 x -1795
Unfortunately, there's not simple formula to identifying all of the factors of a number and it can be a tedious process when trying to identify the divisors of larger numbers. To find the factor combinations of the number 1,671,145, it is easier to work with a table - it's called factoring from the outside in.
We start by creating a table and writing 1 on the left side and then the number we're trying to find the factors for on the right side in a table. Then, below that, write the numbers as a negative as well.
| 1 | 1,671,145 | |
| -1 | -1,671,145 |
When you multiply two negative numbers together, you get a positive number. That means both the positive and negative numbers are factors of 1,671,145.
Example:
1 x 1,671,145 = 1,671,145
and
-1 x -1,671,145 = 1,671,145
Notice both answers equal 1,671,145
With that explanation out of the way, let's continue. Next, we take the number 1,671,145 and divide it by 2:
1,671,145 ÷ 2 = 835,572.5
If the quotient is a whole number, then 2 and 835,572.5 are factors. In this case, the quotient is not a whole number. Don't write anything down and try the next divisor.
Here is what our table should look like at this step:
| 1 | 1,671,145 | |
| -1 | -1,671,145 |
Now, we try dividing 1,671,145 by 3:
1,671,145 ÷ 3 = 557,048.3333
If the quotient is a whole number, then 3 and 557,048.3333 are factors. In this case, the quotient is not a whole number. Don't write anything down and try the next divisor.
Here is what our table should look like at this step:
| 1 | 1,671,145 | |
| -1 | -1,671,145 |
Let's try dividing by 4:
1,671,145 ÷ 4 = 417,786.25
If the quotient is a whole number, then 4 and 417,786.25 are factors. In this case, the quotient is not a whole number. Don't write anything down and try the next divisor.
Here is what our table should look like at this step:
| 1 | 1,671,145 | |
| -1 | 1,671,145 |
If you did it right, you will end up with this table:
| 1 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 35 | 49 | 95 | 133 | 245 | 359 | 665 | 931 | 1,795 | 2,513 | 4,655 | 6,821 | 12,565 | 17,591 | 34,105 | 47,747 | 87,955 | 238,735 | 334,229 | 1,671,145 |
| -1 | -5 | -7 | -19 | -35 | -49 | -95 | -133 | -245 | -359 | -665 | -931 | -1,795 | -2,513 | -4,655 | -6,821 | -12,565 | -17,591 | -34,105 | -47,747 | -87,955 | -238,735 | -334,229 | -1,671,145 |
Here are some more numbers to try:
Try the factor calculator